Quote:
Originally Posted by BamBam0077
V3 is better then v4 by a long shot but by now they should have fixed all the small bugs that alot of people have been having issues with but always keep up with there github page or support forum. They are a great bunch just don't break there rules.
|
It depends on what or more importantly how big your site will get. V4 will be better for larger sites just because of the option of using XBT and more then lightly there's a few improvements but I could not tell You of hand because I've not studied in closer enough But I would assume that V4 would be better for the simple reason for its release.
If there is an option of using a version or enabling XBT when installing I would seriously consider it for the very reason that 1) The option is there 2) It will save time later. 3)
So its a no brianer to 1) Use V4 and 2) Don't be dumb and install it with out the XBT option.
Even though I think that Ocelot is better in my opinion I'm sure that XBT works just fine taking in account that most of the big sites we love and use are indeed using it!!.
Simply because using it without XBT will but it in the category of any other source that also has caching systems and then with out a doubt I would use BT.Manager.
I'm trying to convince Joe Robertson to integrate Ocelot.. I cant wait
If I can convince him lol :)